FEMINISM! What? Yeah.

If you would like to personally let Representative Catherynn Brown of New Mexico know how you feel about this bill, here is her contact information:

Capitol Phone: (505) 986-4248 

Office Phone: (575) 302-2746 

E-mail: cath@cathrynnbrown.com

Personal E-mail: brown55@windstream.net 

Twitter: @CathrynnBrown

sinidentidades:

Washington is engaged in an all-consuming debate about how to resolve the “fiscal cliff” — which we like to call, for reasons that will soon be explained, “the austerity crisis.” But what is that and why does it matter? We at Wonkblog put together a FAQ to sort it out. And we’ll keep updating this FAQ as the debate rages on.

What is the fiscal cliff?

• What is the fiscal cliff in one sentence?
• If it’s not a cliff, then what is it?

What’s in it?

• Taxes
• Spending
• Debt Ceiling

What matters most in it?

What happens if we go over?

• Recession
• Deficit reduction
• Tax increases 

How has Washington tried to solve the fiscal cliff in the past?

• 2010 tax deal
• Simpson/Bowles and the Gang of Six
• Obama/Boehner
• Supercommittee

What do the parties agree on?

• What do they disagree on?

How can we solve it?

• Just go over
• Just go over and then make a deal
• Extend
• Trigger
• Small deal
• Grand bargain

sinidentidades:

Twinkie-maker Hostess continues to screw over its workers. The company is in the process of complete liquidation and 18,000 unionized workers are set to lose their jobs. More troubling – they could lose their pensions.

According to a report by the Wall Street Journal , Hostess’ CEO, Gregory Rayburn, essentially admitted that his company stole employee pension money and put it toward CEO and senior executive pay (aka “operations”). While this isn’t technically illegal, it’s another sleazy theft by Hostess executives - who’ve paid themselves handsomely while running their company into the ground. Just last month, a judge agreed to let Hostess executives suck another $1.8 million out of the bankrupt company to pay bonuses to CEOs.  

If there’s no way to recover the money for the Hostess pension plans for workers, then the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. will have to foot the bill to make sure workers get at least some of the retirement money they paid in.

Hostess shows us clearly what Bain-style predatory capitalism is all about: big bucks for the very few rich executives, layoffs and poverty for the workers and their communities.

And don’t mourn the loss of Hostess brands – they’ll be back, as the company is currently negotiating with over 100 potential buyers right now to bring Twinkies, Wonder Bread, and Ding Dongs back into the marketplace.  

The Hostess story has nothing to do with unions, and everything to do with the Enron-ization and Bain-ization of the American economy.  

In classic Enron style, back in 2005 Hostess sent out a letter saying they’d just had a very, very profitable quarter.  Their stock jumped up. The CEO, Charles Sullivan, and many of the senior executives sold chunks of their stock.   The CEO and senior executives were making out big, and the workers were making a decent living. 

At that time, one of the hostess workers – Mike Hummel, blogging asbluebarnstormer over at Daily Kos – noted that he was making $48,000 a year, a bit over the US median household income, and had insurance and a pension.  

Then, a few weeks later in 2005, came the letter saying that, oops, all of that profit had really been just an accounting error – the company was actually in trouble.  Although the CEO and the top guys had all made a nice killing selling the stock when it was high, and paying a maximum income tax on it of 15 percent because they used the Capital Gains loophole that Mitt Romney used to become a multimillionaire, they now wanted the workers to take a big pay cut. 

Hummel notes that the “oops” letter became the justification for asking the workers to take a pay cut, which they agreed to, and his pay dropped from $48,000 a year in 2005 to $38,000 a year last year.  But every year, $3 an hour of his compensation showed up in the worker’s pension fund instead of his paycheck.  Year after year.  With 18,000-plus workers, it was millions and millions of dollars.  Dollars that the workers had paid in, at the rate of $3 per hour.  

Then came the Bain-style takedown.  In order to strip the company down to its individual brands and sell them off, piece by piece, the company needed to bust the union.  The union said, “No,” so the company went to bankruptcy court – a method Bain and other vulture capitalists often use to kill off unions. 

In the meantime, the CEO and senior executives were paying themselves handsome salaries and big bonuses.  And where was that money coming from?  

On August 12 of 2011, the employees got a letter that said that the company was going to “temporarily suspend payments” to its pension funds.  That would be the $3 per hour that this worker had negotiated as part of his compensation – instead of paying it to him by putting it into his pension fund now, the company said they were going to put it in later. 

As the letter said, “I want to be clear that this temporary suspension of payments to the pension fund will not affect your pension benefits.”  

Workers believed management, and kept on working.  

But, it turned out, as we learned from that interview in today’s Wall Street Journal, that the senior management wasn’t just “borrowing” the pension funds – they were using them to fund ongoing operations.  Including big paychecks to the fatcats. 

Hostess CEO Gregory Rayburn wanted to make it clear that he wasn’t around when that particular thing happened. “Whatever the circumstances were, whatever those decisions were, I wasn’t there,” Rayburn told the Wall Street Journal .  After all, Rayburn isn’t a baker – he’s a bankster.  He’s the owner of Kobi Partners, a company that tells corporations how to “restructure.” Think Mitt Romney. And he’s going to make out very well on all this – the bankruptcy court just okayed $1.8 million in Christmas bonuses for the new fatcats at Hostess. 

Ironically, if you borrow money to pay for your education, you can’t get rid of that debt through bankruptcy – one of the “reforms” of the bankruptcy law during the Bush era.  But if you’re a CEO or a buyout bankster and you borrow money from your employees’ trust fund to be able to cover your own paycheck and million-dollar bonuses, and then take your company into bankruptcy, neither you nor the company have to pay those employees back even a single penny. Part of their pension is picked up by federally-run pension insurance, and the rest is just lost. 

sinidentidades:

San Antonio police are investigating what appears to be a shooting that occurred at the Santikos Mayan Palace 14 movie theater in Texas at approximately 9:20 p.m. Sunday. One female witness told local news station KSAT that she heard “multiple shots” fired, as people ran for the exits. At least two people may have been injured, a number not yet confirmed by authorities. According to local scanner traffic at the time, the shooter may be among the victims. Both the theater and the parking lot have been put on lockdown.

sinidentidades:

Texas landowner secures temporary restraining order against Keystone XL

A Texas landowner in Nacogdoches County secured a temporary restraining order on Tuesday against the southern leg of the Keystone XL pipeline by arguing that tar sands is not actually a type of oil.

Judge Jack Sinz granted the order without first notifying TransCanada, the company behind the ambitious pipeline that aims to transport Canadian tar sands to the Texas gulf coast for further refinement. In his ruling, Judge Sinz noted that the order was granted immediately because construction had already begun on the plaintiff’s property and any delay could potentially result in further damages. A hearing on the matter is set for Wednesday, December 19.

“You can’t argue the science,” 64-year-old Michael Bishop, the plaintiff in the case, told Raw Story on Tuesday. “That’s number one. TransCanada has defrauded the American people into thinking this is crude oil coming in from Canada and is going to be the savior of America. It’s just beyond me. This has been totally misrepresented. The people have been misled. Landowners have been coerced and bullied into thinking the company has the power of eminent domain.”

Bishop, who’s representing himself in the case, has filed several lawsuits in an effort to stop TransCanada’s pipeline, but unlike other land owners who’ve sued over abuse of eminent domain — or protesters who’ve taken to physically blocking construction or simply living in east Texas trees — Bishop has a different strategy.

“He believes that TransCanada has defrauded the people of Texas and of the United States in misrepresenting this as a crude oil pipeline, when it’s not,” Christine Wilson, consultant for Public Citizen Texas, told Raw Story. “He feels that he has a good case. He’s asked for a jury trial for his ultimate permanent injunction case. He intends to prove that diluted bitumen is not crude oil.”

stfuprolife:

WHAT THE MICHIGAN ANTI-ABORTION BILL REALLY DOES

SOURCE: http://www.michnow.org/memo_hb5711analysis.pdf

The Republican-controlled Michigan Senate now has before it a draconian anti-abortion clinic bill designed to make the full range of reproductive health services, including abortion care, inaccessible for Michigan women. The bill passed the Michigan House in June. The most potentially dangerous, expensive, and degrading provisions in HB 5711 would:

REQUIRE DISPOSAL OF “FETAL REMAINS” LIKE A DEAD BODY
– Michigan will become the first state in the nation to require any woman who seeks an abortion or miscarries to decide how she will dispose of the “fetal remains.”

WHAT THIS REALLY DOES:
At 10 weeks: A woman must pay for a funeral home to transport fetal remains and to decide amongst burial, cremation, or interment. Current law requires the products of conception to be hygienically incinerated.

HB 5711, if passed,
Misleads women into thinking of the fetal issue as a person and abortion as murder.
Traumatizes and shames women at a difficult time and adds unnecessary expense to an abortion.

At 20 weeks: Additionally, either the physician or the coroner must file a Death Certificate, a public record which may be reported in the local newspaper and remains permanently on file with the State.

HB 5711, if passed,
Robs women of their right to privacy and potentially makes miscarriage and abortion public.

STOP DOCTORS FROM PERFORMING ABORTIONS – Doctors who would perform more than five abortions a month in the office (or who meet other criteria) must do so only in a licensed freestanding surgical facility and buy $1 million in liability insurance.

WHAT THIS REALLY DOES:
Makes providing abortion services prohibitively expensive for doctors so that they will give up the practice. The requirements for surgical facilities won’t make women safer, the insurance is not currently available in Michigan and, even if it were, it would likely be prohibitively expensive and make the cost of abortion beyond the reach of most women. Current laws adequately protect women and should be enforced.

RESTRICT FREE SPEECH IN THE GUISE OF PREVENTING “COERCION” – Doctors must verify that patients have been “screened” about whether they were coerced into seeking an abortion.

WHAT THIS REALLY DOES:
Makes parents, spouses, and others subject to lawsuits for counseling a woman about making informed choices, while frightening doctors from providing abortions for fear of legal action.

END THE TELE-MEDICINE OPTION – The new law would prohibit doctors from dispensing safe medication abortions or emergency contraception drugs such as Ella through telemedicine protocols. The bill even requires that medication abortions be performed at a licensed freestanding surgical facility!

WHAT THIS REALLY DOES:
Adds physical and financial barriers that discourage women from exercising their legally-protected rights without making them any safer.
Makes abortion unavailable to women in underserved areas, which includes more than 83% of Michigan
counties.

WHAT THESE LAWS ALSO DO IS DISCOURAGE GOOD DOCTORS FROM PRACTICING IN MICHIGAN - Dr. Michael Allswede of the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists testified against the bill, arguing that his organization knows the bill will make it harder to recruit doctors to practice in Michigan. Studies show Michigan could lack as many as 4,500 doctors by 2020, and this legislation would make matters worse.

Contact your Senator and Governor Snyder and tell them to reject HB 5711.
See www.michnow.org for contact information.

*this does not affect just women

(Source: stfuprolifers, via bebinn)

think-progress:

Notice a difference?

GOP’s new House Committee Chairs vs. Democrats

aka

19 white men vs. most diverse yet

(via feminishblog)

demnewswire:

 Taxes on the wealthy are going up, House Speaker John Boehner conceded on Wednesday in challenging President Barack Obama to sit down with him to hammer out a deal for avoiding the fiscal cliff.

The statement to reporters reflected how negotiations on reducing the nation’s chronic federal deficits and debt have evolved since Obama’s re-election last month.

(Source: CNN)

fuckyeahfeminists:

oneluv918:

Walmart, the world’s largest retailer and America’s largest employer has announced that they will stop offering health insurance to new hires. Walmart is blaming the Affordable Care Act (AKA Obamacare) for the decision to deny healthcare to their newest employees. Walmart currently employs more than 1.4 million workers. Walmart has declined to disclose how many workers would be affected by the change in policy. One of the key provisions of the Affordable Care Act is the expansion of Medicaid to cover people who make under a certain level of income. Labor and Health Care experts are saying that a majority of Walmart’s workers will qualify for Medicare under the new law. If an employer has a worker that receives insurance through Medicare than their employer has to pay a fine. The fine is substantially less than the cost of health care for the worker. 

A reminder that Walmart sucks. Just in case you forgot. This is more of a political statement than anything. Walmart has a long record of treating their workers badly. Studies repeatedly show that allowing your workers to have health insurance and be healthier is a benefit for the employer.